radius error received conflicting packet from client Catlett Virginia

Address 13409 Keating Dr, Woodbridge, VA 22193
Phone (703) 980-3263
Website Link http://cgs4.com
Hours

radius error received conflicting packet from client Catlett, Virginia

No, thanks Skip to content Search… Search Quick links Unanswered topics Active topics Search The team Active topics Active topics Forum Community discussions Search… Search Quick links Unanswered topics Active topics I could not find anything about this parameter. do you not understand the basic context of this issue? Thu May 14 09:27:42 2015 : Info : WARNING,Child is hung for request 872368 in component preacct module .

by a > slight margin, even though they logically are whatever that > special-cased conditional was designed to handle. 1 second? But in your case requests are > still being processed 4 minutes after NAS sent them (if that is your retry > interval on the NAS as you claim - default To me, it is better not to get updates as often and freeing up the radius server to handle logins.Sounds like you need more power somewhere. No amount of outright denial will change that.

I looked in src/main/event.c and found this code: default: gettimeofday(&when, NULL); Sign up for the SourceForge newsletter: I agree to receive quotes, newsletters and other information from sourceforge.net and its partners regarding IT services and products. NAS will just ignore that reply - it gave up on that request already. > >> "Fixing" FreeRADIUS to spend more time processing useless requests >> will only make the What should I change inradiusd.conf to elliminate these errors?You don't.

But in your case requests are > still being processed 4 minutes after NAS sent them (if that is your retry > interval on the NAS as you claim - default Many thanks to anyone. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? No. and you told us we were wrong. > >>> Stop hacking the server and start looking at your perl code.

The issue is the following: I regularly get the following message in the logs: Fri Mar 27 17:22:36 2015 : Error: Received conflicting packet from client dhcp port 42067 - ID: It SHOULD wait 5 > seconds for the old request to time out, before sending a new one that > re-uses the same IP/port/Id. > > Take your NAS, and This has been explained to you. > > Did you understand the explanation, or are you simply ignoring it? > Explained what? Once again: I >> suppose that what freeradius thinks of as "Received conflicting packet >> ..." are rather a bit delayed packets normally treated as "Discarding >> conflicting

your RADIUS timeout is 4 minutes??? Isn't Cisco 7260 good enough for you? Some duplicate packets might arrive after 1 sec. Ivan Kalik Kalik Informatika ISP - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe?

Yes, it should. The code will NOT be > changed to discard the new packet. > Perhaps someone more knowledgeable than you will be more able to assess all points involved. >> I propose Giving up on old request. Once again: I >>>> suppose that what freeradius thinks of as "Received conflicting packet >>>> ..." are rather a bit delayed packets normally treated as "Discarding >>>> conflicting packet ...", i.e.

those will be sent again.....then you need to deal with the ones already being dealt with. Nonsense. Top natanielklug Frequent Visitor Topic Author Posts: 94 Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 6:09 pm Reputation: 0 Location: Cascavel/PR/Brasil Re: Freeradius and MySQL 0 Quote #6 Thu May 09, 2013 Alan DeKok. - List info/subscribe/unsubscribe?

Maybe you should keep your required records in an archive database of previous weeks/months instead of storing them all in the active database. If there's no DB, FreeRADIUS can do 10's of 1000's of requests per second. That is > why it gave up on them and sent a new request. Error: Received conflicting packet rihad rihad at mail.ru Mon Oct 12 12:37:33 CEST 2009 Previous message: Error: Received conflicting packet Next message: Error: Received conflicting packet Messages sorted by: [ date

if the NAS >>> has sent a repeat RADIUS packet then it means that the original packet >>> has already been timed out and the NAS should NOT accept an 'accept' What does it mean?Best regards,Serg-List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html tnt-5 Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view ♦ ♦ | Report Content as Inappropriate ♦ ♦ Re: Error: Received conflicting packet >>> Our radius-server timeout Buy a faster machine, do load balancing, or fix your Perl script to run faster. > but aborting the current packet instead of > the new duplicate one can hardly be

if the NAS > has sent a repeat RADIUS packet then it means that the original packet > has already been timed out and the NAS should NOT accept an 'accept' I�ve pushed a fix which disables duplicate checking for DHCP sockets. See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html Alan DeKok-2 Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view ♦ ♦ | Report Content as Inappropriate ♦ ♦ Re: Error: Received conflicting packet rihad wrote: > The only problem being your inability to comprehend that > freeradius is not faulty but it is your perl script that can't cope.

it's broken. Do you really need to use it for authentication? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html Tim Sylvester Reply | Threaded Open this post in threaded view ♦ ♦ | Report Content as Inappropriate ♦ ♦ RE: Error: Received conflicting packet In reply to Or another version?

Mikrotik Router > freeradius server > Mysql Server From time to time (Maybe once in 4-5 days) i get this error repeated for many many times: Thu Jul 3 17:39:33 2008 The duplicate one is an indication that the *NAS* has given up on the first packet. your debug messages show two things: slow Perls scripts, and a buggy NAS. Giving up on old request.Thu Nov 27 12:44:06 2008 : Error: Received conflicting packet from client x.y.31.1 port 1646 - ID: 101 due to unfinished request 54545.

Let's waste more CPU time rendering content that will *NEVER* make it to the client! Isn't Cisco 7260 good enough for you? >> Now, it can be logically deduced that a big part of the >> latter are indeed of the former type (because none of Buy a real NAS that > > implements RADIUS. > > > Oh yeah? Top voxframe Member Candidate Posts: 126 Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 3:51 pm Reputation: 0 Re: Freeradius and MySQL 0 Quote #7 Thu May 09, 2013 4:52 pm What is

And your argument about RFC compliance is made to the wrong person. Can you get all the data in authorize >> script and let freeradius default modules do the authentication (that can >> speed things up quite a bit)? Perhaps it's not fast enough to process many many requests in > under 1 second (when.tv_sec), No, it *is* too slow to process requests. Giving up on old request.

Buy a real NAS that > implements RADIUS. > Oh yeah? do you not understand the basic context of this issue? FreeRADIUS, MySQL with custom SQL code and the Cisco 72XX were able to authenticate over 14,000 PPoE sessions in 30 seconds. if your PERL is the problem, then increase number of threads/children so you can handle more....

But due to it being unable to work reasonably under certain circumstances, and due to its author preferring to stick with the arguable RFC specification which is outright buggy, I was