root 256 inode error 400 Nikolai Alaska

Established in 1994, Rocket is your trusted provider of Satellite TV, Satellite Internet, Video Surveillance, Home Theater Systems and Installations throughout South-central Alaska and beyond. We provide a variety of packages and products for small business and residential customers. In the Anchorage area we come to you with free surveys, free delivery and setup. Rocket works within your budget and timeline to provide you with the best value. We understand that you have unique needs. No job is too small! Not only do we install our products, we can install most any of your electronics in your home or business. They can be your current products, new purchases from somewhere else or from us. Rocket does it all. From the design, purchases, delivery and installation all within your schedule and budget and we will even take the time to show you how to operate them. Thats why our motto is Excellence in Home Entertainment! Our showroom is your home or office. We have vendors in the Northwest that carry all makes and models of electronics, cables and interconnect products. Utilizing there warehouse along with freight carriers, we are able to offer installations within 2-3 business days at competitive rates.

Fiber Optics-Components, Equipment & Systems, Information Technologies

Address 13131 Elmhurst Cir, Anchorage, AK 99515
Phone (907) 563-5563
Website Link

root 256 inode error 400 Nikolai, Alaska

sudo btrfs check --repair /dev/sda9 enabling repair mode Checking filesystem on /dev/sda9 UUID: 82fca3c2-703b-4fae-aec2-6b7df1be71c1 checking extents Fixed 0 roots. I am willing to try a fresh network install to a virtual machine when the above rpm is pushed to stable. Yes, not the 100% best choice of words, but warranting a comment with the word "devoid" it does not. Format For Printing -XML -Clone This Bug -Top of page First Last Prev Next This bug is not in your last search results.

Asking for a guide based on whether a hapless user would use such wording seems like a bad way of going about asking a question... –Chris Down Feb 23 '12 at This is a data corruption. The whole process got documented in an email thread. When the device starts, the root-fs is mounted readonly.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 20 is end of life. well, I've included the information required. Hopefully, there is nothing to worry much about. Or maybe I just got "lucky".

I'm not sure when these errors first started as I don't often run btrfs check, but it's quite a young file system, maybe only two weeks old. We have noted that there is a newer version of the development kernel than the one you last tested when this issue was found. Gparted then ran to successful completion. I have deliberately omitted my exact FS issues (for the moment); I want to find a general/canonical workflow and troubleshooting guide. (Ok, ok - here's some more details ;)): I powered

My kernel is 3.0.3. > > Regards 1. fsck btrfs share|improve this question edited Dec 5 '13 at 13:44 erch 1,53762748 asked Feb 22 '12 at 23:54 Stephen 3402515 closed as too broad by LawrenceC, slm♦, jasonwryan, Anthon, Zelda It will expect a certain value back on boot but if that TRANSACTION Didnt get written to disk (but only to log, which also sometimes is on disk) then these errors I presonally feel safe if its just 1 or 2 off. –kossboss Jan 6 '14 at 23:40 I must reward for providing an answer, although I have no idea

Same if I check this install with btrfs-progs 3.14. Mikko Rönkkö (mikko-ronkko) wrote on 2011-10-06: #25 If I add 'noauto' as an option to the btrfs partition and mount it in a separate upstart job after mounting the other partitions, I have already deleted /etc/shadow- using instructions from the web so I could shrink the btrfs system. I haven't compared the checksums of files but I > haven't found any other then 1 new file with random (i.e.

Changed in linux (Ubuntu): status: New → Incomplete NoahY (noahy) wrote on 2011-07-21: #19 @brad-figg that is exactly what I did... Can you confirm the file system was created by a Fedora 20 installer? dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrFb5:bd05/21/2010:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnX58A-UD3R:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnX58A-UD3R:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr: X58A-UD3R dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. Cannot patch Sitecore initialize pipeline (Sitecore 8.1 Update 3) define set of sets New employee has offensive Slack handle due to language barrier Do set theorists work in T?

If there's problems with the chunk tree -- the only one I've seen recently was reporting something like "can't map address" -- then chunk-recover may be of use. Marco Menardi (mmenaz) wrote on 2011-12-03: #27 I had a slow startup too. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '20'. It it too far to equate "issues" to some activity (either in linux, btrfs, or external action a-la power cuts) that leads to corruption?

Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Let's consider "root 256 inode 967929 errors 1800" for instance. It should be easy to reproduce. How to explain the use of high-tech bows instead of guns How to leave a job for ethical/moral issues without explaining details to a potential employer Modo di dire per esprimere

Where Are Those Files? Finding and deleting the problematic inode fixed the problem and allowed be to continue with expanding the btrfs filesystem in gparted. Started at 00:00 AM and now at 10:30 AM the unpacking of the update is 2/3 ready. Sean currently works at Northfield IT and is responsible for infrastructure automation for a large professional sports league.

Just remember that linux is becoming more mainstream (as is btrfs), and there are going to be newbies around (which I am not). Review questions help you assess your knowledge, and a final preparation chapter guides you through tools and resources to help you craft your final study plan.   The book also contains If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. I've been told that the latter errors (nbytes wrong) should be harmless.

I'm not sure when these errors first started as I don't often run btrfs check, but it's quite a young file system, maybe only two weeks old. I'm just curious about when to use various techniques: -o recovery, btrfsck, chunk-recover, zero log. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. If you want this bot to quit automatically requesting kernel tests, add a tag named: bot-stop-nagging.